Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,205,535 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 43.6 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $76,910, a difference of 41.4%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $45,176, a difference of 40.2%), and per capita income ($52,044 compared to $37,193, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $53,174, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $45,793, a difference of 22.1%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 51.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 59.6%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.10%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%).