Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,951,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $56,495, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $40,773, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($71,860 compared to $80,324, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,193 compared to $50,321, a difference of 8.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $90,186, a difference of 9.3%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $40,742, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (41.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.4%), bachelor's degree (31.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.2%).