Immigrants from Caribbean vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,717,703 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,254 compared to $31,729, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($71,860 compared to $63,681, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $71,337, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $49,234, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $35,266, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $38,707, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 75.0%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 74.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 215.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 214.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 192.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.6%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.82, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 77.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 11.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 54.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 77.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 2.6%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 99.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).