Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,030,477 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.876. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.992% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to an increase of 992.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $33,291, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $44,735, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $50,374, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $80,662, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $76,701, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 125.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 13.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.47%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%).