Immigrants from Caribbean vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,434,842 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to an increase of 9.2 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $40,299, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $44,552, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $51,844, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $85,571, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($71,860 compared to $75,647, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.7%), receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.2%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.17%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 51.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (31.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.26%).