Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,289,737 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($83,319 compared to $109,975, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $107,357, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $62,939, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $56,168, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $42,304, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $50,274, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 79.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 58.9%), and family poverty (12.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 100.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.4%), no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%).