Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,097,608 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $53,967, a difference of 11.2%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $90,450, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $87,739, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $80,863, a difference of 0.67%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $38,165, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.50%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.5%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (40.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 60.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.60%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).