Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,297,409 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $60,096, a difference of 23.8%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $102,823, a difference of 23.4%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $44,509, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $51,574, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $41,485, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 67.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 25.8%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 85.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 11.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 65.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.4%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%).