Immigrants from Caribbean vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 291,173,062 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $64,920, a difference of 33.8%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $98,778, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $37,497, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $53,078, a difference of 4.6%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $39,403, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 64.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 60.6%), and receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.0%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 144.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 101.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 66.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (31.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.66%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.7%).