Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,288,712 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 13.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $39,194, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $88,291, a difference of 17.2%), and median male earnings ($59,217 compared to $50,772, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $51,615, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $58,244, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 68.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.7%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.57%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.92%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%).