Russian vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Russian
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Russians
Malaysians
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Russian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,451,518 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 74.9 Malaysians.
Russian vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $39,194, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $95,230, a difference of 26.5%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $50,772, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,615, a difference of 5.4%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $58,244, a difference of 16.1%).
Income Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,154 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,487 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,008 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,334 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,939 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,169 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,389 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,398 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,328 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,626 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.0% |
Russian vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.6% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Russian vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Russian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.8% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.0% |
Russian vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 33.9% |
Russian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.8% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Russian vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 86.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.5% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.2% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Russian vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Russian | Malaysian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |