Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nepal

Malaysians

Good
Fair
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,086,243 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Malaysians.
Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Malaysian Communities

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,187 compared to $39,194, a difference of 12.7%), median family income ($104,966 compared to $95,230, a difference of 10.2%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $50,772, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.67%), householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $51,615, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $58,244, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,187
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Good
$104,966
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Good
$87,046
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,925
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,615
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,704
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,611
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,322
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,190
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,843
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.080%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.7%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.1%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.50%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 28.3%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NepalMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%