Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,232,959 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 33.0 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 29.5%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $37,298, a difference of 9.6%), and per capita income ($41,476 compared to $39,194, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($80,373 compared to $81,064, a difference of 0.86%), median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $50,772, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $95,230, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.79%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 219.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 86.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.3%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.9%).