Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,653,364 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 241.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $39,194, a difference of 32.1%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $50,772, a difference of 22.5%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $95,230, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,615, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $58,244, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.50%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.31, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.3%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.99%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%).