Indian (Asian) vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,205,660 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $39,194, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $88,291, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $95,230, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,615, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $58,244, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.99%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 82.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 99.9%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 92.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.6%).