Jordanian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Malaysians

Exceptional
Fair
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,586,017 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 89.2 Malaysians.
Jordanian Integration in Malaysian Communities

Jordanian vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,605 compared to $39,194, a difference of 16.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $94,517, a difference of 15.7%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $95,230, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.35%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $58,244, a difference of 10.4%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricJordanianMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Excellent
25.0%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.5%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.0%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianMalaysian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
33.9%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.6%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.3%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Jordanian vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Jordanian vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricJordanianMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%