Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,909,368 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $52,121, a difference of 20.7%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $39,608, a difference of 19.9%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $95,402, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $52,621, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $92,322, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.3%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 95.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.6%).