Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,039,734 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 128.1 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.1%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $53,715, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $97,373, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $41,485, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $60,096, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $47,657, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 34.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.89%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.46%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%).