Immigrants from Moldova vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,400,751 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.666% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 665.7 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $40,669, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($91,446 compared to $79,429, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $88,301, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $57,426, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $94,448, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 30.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.2%).