Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,075,455 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.315% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 314.5 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $33,931, a difference of 40.0%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $44,960, a difference of 32.2%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $83,639, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $50,422, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $52,801, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 61.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.4% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 84.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 82.0%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.65%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%).