Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,481,661 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 90.0 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $45,979, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $61,041, a difference of 3.1%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $101,065, a difference of 0.030%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $106,319, a difference of 0.98%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $90,549, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.6%), births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.83%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%).