Immigrants from Moldova vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,325,959 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 72.1 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $51,678, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $40,491, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,489 compared to $47,698, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $107,870, a difference of 0.48%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $110,635, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 0.020%), college, 1 year or more (63.0% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.83%).