Immigrants from Moldova vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,262,044 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.973. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 65.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $32,345, a difference of 46.8%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $41,758, a difference of 42.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $75,945, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $59,383, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $44,003, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 96.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 64.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 188.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 149.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 72.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.64, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 56.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 69.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 67.3%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.19%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.82%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.0%).