Immigrants from Australia vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,111,793 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.175% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 174.9 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $39,870, a difference of 45.4%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $51,473, a difference of 31.4%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $97,288, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $52,365, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $57,919, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.9%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 94.6%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 91.3%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.6%).