Immigrants from Australia vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,540,462 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.228% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to a decrease of 1,227.8 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $50,057, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $63,827, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $119,955, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $68,822, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $57,003, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $118,426, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (61.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.28, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.1%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).