Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,235,205 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 189.3 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $42,289, a difference of 37.0%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $52,908, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $91,337, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $50,645, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $60,217, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (61.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 61.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.4%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.6%).