Immigrants from Australia vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,423,060 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 118.0 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $47,698, a difference of 21.5%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $58,588, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $100,457, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.27%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $64,658, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,678, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.5%).