Immigrants from Australia vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,725,847 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.941% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 940.7 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $39,403, a difference of 47.1%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $50,488, a difference of 34.0%), and median earnings ($56,305 compared to $43,673, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $64,920, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $53,078, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 71.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 53.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 100.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 8.2%).