Immigrants from Australia vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,852,736 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 122.7 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $44,076, a difference of 31.5%), median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $37,904, a difference of 22.9%), and median earnings ($56,305 compared to $46,315, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,493, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $61,621, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (47.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 76.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%).