Immigrants from Australia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,529,972 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.979. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 173.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $32,345, a difference of 79.2%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $41,758, a difference of 62.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $71,697, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $59,383, a difference of 16.5%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $44,003, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 79.7%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 67.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 181.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 148.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 146.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 76.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.8%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (61.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 88.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 140.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 140.1%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 55.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.6%).