Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,103,543 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.870. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.912% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 912.4 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $34,910, a difference of 54.1%), median family income ($120,445 compared to $78,249, a difference of 53.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $44,735, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $33,291, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 116.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 73.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (20.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 40.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 134.2%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 80.0%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.2%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%).