Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,873,567 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.186% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 5,185.7 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($114,826 compared to $78,249, a difference of 46.7%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $34,910, a difference of 45.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $44,735, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $33,291, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 101.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 70.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 42.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 102.5%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 75.5%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.63%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).