Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,325,138 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $44,735, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($106,969 compared to $78,249, a difference of 36.7%), and per capita income ($45,923 compared to $34,910, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,408 compared to $50,374, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,256 compared to $76,701, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 94.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 71.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 39.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 99.9%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 65.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).