Estonian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,036,098 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to a decrease of 128.0 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,926 compared to $44,735, a difference of 51.8%), median family income ($118,013 compared to $78,249, a difference of 50.8%), and per capita income ($51,875 compared to $34,910, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($43,106 compared to $33,291, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 119.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 85.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.67%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 42.0%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 114.9%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.0%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).