Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,478,485 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.607% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 607.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $44,735, a difference of 46.9%), median family income ($112,038 compared to $78,249, a difference of 43.2%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $34,910, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $33,291, a difference of 24.0%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 108.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 83.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 33.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.5%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%).