British West Indian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,297,107 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.337% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 336.9 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.1%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $33,291, a difference of 21.0%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $38,426, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $80,662, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($75,647 compared to $68,461, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.0%), receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 58.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (62.8% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 241.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 64.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 63.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.4%).