Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,561,007 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.167% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 167.2 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($114,586 compared to $78,249, a difference of 46.4%), median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $43,461, a difference of 44.2%), and per capita income ($50,303 compared to $34,910, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $50,374, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $33,291, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 80.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 52.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.8%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 61.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 92.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 89.8%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 74.0%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.32%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%).