Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,390,518 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $44,735, a difference of 31.8%), median family income ($96,439 compared to $78,249, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $68,461, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $76,701, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 58.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.9%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.2%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.37%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.0%).