Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,791,046 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.788% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 787.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $44,735, a difference of 27.4%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $34,910, a difference of 26.0%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $78,249, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $50,374, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $33,291, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 66.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.7%).