French American Indian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,784,034 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 71.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $44,735, a difference of 22.3%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $78,249, a difference of 18.7%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $43,461, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $33,291, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $80,662, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 55.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 54.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.0%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.7%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.55%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.7%).