Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,319,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.435% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 434.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $44,735, a difference of 34.3%), median family income ($102,823 compared to $78,249, a difference of 31.4%), and per capita income ($44,509 compared to $34,910, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $80,662, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 77.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 56.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 30.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and family households (60.8% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.65%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 79.8%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).