Fijian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,058,617 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 32.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $44,735, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($87,387 compared to $78,249, a difference of 11.7%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $68,461, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,374, a difference of 0.48%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $76,701, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 68.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 68.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 28.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.9%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and associate's degree (37.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.3%).