Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,030,357 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.522% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 522.0 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $44,735, a difference of 33.8%), median family income ($101,354 compared to $78,249, a difference of 29.5%), and per capita income ($43,464 compared to $34,910, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $33,291, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 70.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 51.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.63%), single female poverty (20.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.4%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.9%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.030%), family households (65.6% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%).