Mongolian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Mongolians

Arapaho

Good
Fair
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Mongolian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,480,972 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.481% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 1,481.3 Arapaho.
Mongolian Integration in Arapaho Communities

Mongolian vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $32,345, a difference of 52.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $75,945, a difference of 46.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $71,697, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $44,003, a difference of 19.4%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricMongolianArapaho
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,173
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,553
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,971
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,038
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,350
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,542
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,540
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,578
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,602
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,326
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Exceptional
23.5%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 80.4%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 57.2%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.5%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricMongolianArapaho
Poverty
Average
12.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 194.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 149.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 145.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMongolianArapaho
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.2%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMongolianArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
77.1%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 68.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMongolianArapaho
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
47.1%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 78.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.0%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMongolianArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
9.4%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 136.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.4%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.26%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and 11th grade (93.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricMongolianArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.8%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.0%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.2%

Mongolian vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Mongolian vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricMongolianArapaho
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%