Mongolian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,778,911 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 268.0 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $39,826, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $51,389, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $44,206, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $65,427, a difference of 0.15%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $54,610, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.6%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 72.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 94.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 84.5%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.2%).