Mongolian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,066,690 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $29,031, a difference of 69.4%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $70,989, a difference of 61.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $69,759, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $42,380, a difference of 24.0%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $33,046, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 136.5%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 118.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.3%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 57.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 116.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 108.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 101.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 84.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (62.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.7%), no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.5%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 105.7%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 62.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.5%).