Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,785,005 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 225.9 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $54,830, a difference of 2.3%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $66,125, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $69,703, a difference of 0.030%), median earnings ($54,478 compared to $54,679, a difference of 0.37%), and median household income ($100,699 compared to $100,306, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.55%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.7%), master's degree (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.12%).