Immigrants from Sweden vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,108,081 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 124.8 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $37,589, a difference of 47.9%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $85,294, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $82,736, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $47,448, a difference of 13.0%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $36,424, a difference of 22.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 78.2%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 60.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 38.7%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.7%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 8.4%).