Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,183,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to a decrease of 59.4 Immigrants from Pakistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $47,084, a difference of 18.0%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $114,406, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $60,987, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($100,699 compared to $97,528, a difference of 3.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $114,434, a difference of 3.4%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.1%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households (62.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (47.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.49%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%).