Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Colombia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,397,464 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.834% in Immigrants from Colombia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,834.1 Immigrants from Colombia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $42,971, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $98,067, a difference of 25.2%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $52,725, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $53,714, a difference of 0.17%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $38,913, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.83%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (47.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 72.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).